"This house would revoke architecture licenses from architects of establishments
that significantly damage the environment."
I oppose this motion because first of all, an architect cannot pass or make a project a reality if it will not be signed
by engineers or any person that it above him/ her. Second, why must it only be the architects? There are many
people who bring significant damage to the environment or even worse. Third, it is the government that gives
an architect a license and if they are to take it away from him for a not so valid reason, then that would be equal
to them corrupting the architect’s money. It is tiring and stressful to study architecture and his license will only
be revoked for a single project that not only he passes it? Come on. Every building has a permit from the
government so it means that they approve of the construction of such infrastructure and they are aware of the
consequences. If ever such project harmed or will harm the environment, then they shouldn’t have approved of it.
It is very confusing as to why the government would have this motion that in the first place, they have gone through
all the processes.
No comments:
Post a Comment